Bigman80
Grandmaster
AA Founding Member & Bigbottle Audio Creator
Posts: 16,358
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 7, 2018 7:54:18 GMT
If and when we grow, I thiught it would be good to have a place to discuss these speakers and their design. I know little about them myself, so it will give me a chance to learn from others too.
I recently saw an article saying Ken Kessler had gone back to LS3/5a speakers and it showed a pic of them. The thing is, he was using two pairs, one on top of the other, the top pair were sat upside down.
Now I like the idea of stacking speakers and have a few future plans myself. For now I was just wondering if Ken was being revolutionary in terms of LS3/5as or was he copying something they did in broadcasting? Does anyone know? I would've expected them to be laid sideways with tweeters out-over if stacked,
If anyone would care to add some detail about thenvarious versions of the LS3/5a, imfirbone would love to read about it. I see Rogers ones going for £500 whilst others go fir 2-3 times that. I realise they are probably all past their sell by date and it's collectors value, but I would be interested to know. If you want to post info on this thread, that's fine. Anyone wants to make a specific LS3/5a thread, that's great too. It would just be nice to know more without having to take months of researching.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on May 16, 2018 17:55:41 GMT
The LS3/5A is worthy of a small book, so varied is the story. Can't stand the effers - and I've heard 'hundreds' of different ones from various makers and eras...
Andrew, rather than stack like this and risking phasing effects of two separate tweeters interfering with each other, just get a bloody bigger one! If it's to be a 'BBC Boomer,' then BC1's, SP1's or Harbeths if you can give them enough room.
I've become summat of an apologist for generic BBC inspired speakers. the only two 'classic' ones that come up usually are the 3/5A and Spendor BC1, this latter of which the Beeb bought a few hundred pairs rather than the 'official' LS3/6 model which languished until Rogers took out the auto-transformer and called it the Export, which I didn't think was quite as good as the BC1 anyway! All the others - other Spendors which came after Spencer's passing in 1983, Harbeths, Rogers and so on, are nowt to do with the BBC at all and some of them were absolute effin' horrors in UK rooms, booming, soggy and lush toned! Far eastern audio people lap 'em up, use them with valve amps and vinyl...
P.S. I've just bought a pair of cheap JBL Control 1's as 'test' speakers to replace some Diamond IV's I was getting bored with. If you're going to have a miniature box, you can do a hell of a lot worse than these. I'm actually rather enjoying them despite a lack of deep bass (perfect for my needs) and a surprisingly restrained mid treble region where I could do with a touch more sparkle.
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
AA Founding Member & Bigbottle Audio Creator
Posts: 16,358
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 16, 2018 19:39:01 GMT
I have so little experience of BBC inspired designs, all info ismwelcome thanks, Dave. I did hear BC1s in a suitable room and their soundstage was really nice. It was a customer who invited me round to hear his dilemma: A 303 which raced along through the BC1s bit didn't do the full soundstage thing and a new 306 which did, but was so slow in comparison. I told him to buy a Naim 250.,,,,,,,only joking, I actually said he might want to get the 303 serviced. If I was a classical music fan, I'd consider BC1s because they were very lifelike in many ways that suit classical.
I don't know if the original Rogers LS7 would be regarded as a BBC inspired design. The pair I had weren't bad but I had just let my ES14s go and they weren't as good.
When I worked in a hifi shop, we stocked Spendor Preludes and I did like them although they were a touch laid back for me.
Harbeth? Well my mate had HL-P3 which were nice but not really exciting enough for me,
I did have a pair of Control ones many years ago, but I returned them next day. They were just too small sounding, but I think I was only using a Cyrus 1 so hardly ideal.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on May 17, 2018 7:13:20 GMT
Back in the 70's and into the 80's too I believe in the UK speaker scene you had a choice. So called tonal accuracy but little dynamics, or an exciting listen that sounded little or nothing like real life. I could go on for hours but no time and gentle rise taking elsewhere means I should button it a bit
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
AA Founding Member & Bigbottle Audio Creator
Posts: 16,358
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 17, 2018 7:33:55 GMT
Back in the 70's and into the 80's too I believe in the UK speaker scene you had a choice. So called tonal accuracy but little dynamics, or an exciting listen that sounded little or nothing like real life. I could go on for hours but no time and gentle rise taking elsewhere means I should button it a bit That's a pretty good summary tbh. I was always in the latter camp. If anyone criticizes you, or anyone else, for taking about hifi on a hifi forum it speaks only of them, not you
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on May 17, 2018 10:36:44 GMT
A comment today nicked from the Spendor Yahoo group regarding why so-called 'BBC Speakers' may sound as they do.
"Initially the producers comparing the control room sound to the live orchestras next door complained of a too "forward" sound. It was decided that a flat response around the ears most sensitive area was too much and a more natural sound was achieved by a flat, wide 1 or 2 dB dip around 1 to 3 kHz. This was easily achieved because near the existing crossover point so values could again be chosen to compensate. Dynamics have nothing to do with it unless the driver or crossover components are pushed into overloading or the amp runs out of steam. However a less "forward" or "in your face" sound could be mistaken for lack of dynamics in the same way that a JBL or Cerwin Vega might sound initially more exciting when switched from a more neutral sound - before fatigue sets in that is!."
Now, this from probably an older person who hasn't heard *current* JBL monitor designs, which don't squawk and screech as they once did.
I now have two problems with the average Harbeth especially - (Spendor are hauling themselves well out of this more and trad owners don't care much for them, finding them too 'bright' where I love 'em for this)! - The bass is often left underdamped and is optimised for free space mounting (they're tested high on spindly mounts in the middle of the countryside in their case I believe), so used too close to the wall not only does the *quantity* of bass increase, but the boomy aspect is greatly magnified. My own SHL5's (I came by them honestly) sound off terribly in our little room and it masks the pleasant things happening above. My ears are now slightly damaged in that the 'glare' frequencies (right where BBC types suck out) don't 'glare' as they ought to, so self effacing speakers like this sound slightly muffled to me. the current Harbeth models coming through and even subtly better, the Anniversary editions with posher crossover caps and bling added, have been livened and tautened up somewhat and now, they sound as if they have a carrot up their jacksie unless you use a seriously powerful amp to drive them - far eastern audiophools still use them with valve gear which does all manner of 'stuff' to the sound and measured response.
One BBC monitor I'd like to hear from the 'golden age of bextrene' - cough - is the LS5/5, which apparently was the last one to be designed for a properly flat 'monitor' response. the replacement 5/8 and the smaller 5/9 have the upper mids reduced and they HAVE to be used on tallish stands and pulled well out from walls. My LS5/9's (I'm waiting for suitable boxes and packing so I can sell them) sound great when used properly and 'tubby' when used here
P.S. I may seem to be joining the crowd that slags off 'BBC-type' speakers, but these are as nothing to what Pro-Ac did with many of theirs in the 90's (the Response 2 being a notable exception I recall). Bass on many Pro-Acs is 'woofy' in the extreme, the highs sparkle and zip along un-naturally and the mids are miles away, but in a big room, the soundstage is artificially deepened so that if the speakers were placed either side of an open door, the musicians appear to be playing somewhere in the room behind... The designer wanted it this way as he's able to get basically similar sounds from all manner of drive-unit combinations - and that does take skill...
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
AA Founding Member & Bigbottle Audio Creator
Posts: 16,358
|
Post by Bigman80 on May 17, 2018 11:34:12 GMT
Funny you should mention ProAcs. I've tried a few and it's always the bass I can't get on with. Even the Super Tablettes (what bass?) and those that followed seem to have a loose quality that I can't get past, That isn't the right word but I can't find one that suits. Basically it doesn't gel or play in time with the rest of the sound, I'm not a fan of rear ports generally but the Proacs seem to have something else added to that. I can always hear their qualities, but they rarely stick around.
The antithesis of what i understand as the BBC sound are Snell speakers. I haven't heard one I didn't like. The timing and lack of restriction is always a joy. They are probably the only "straight shooters" I would own and keep. I doubt they are accurate in their frequency response, but in the way they capture intensity and timing, I find them compelling. They aren't just valve-tuned speakers either. In fact, they weren't even designed using valve amps.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on May 17, 2018 13:23:04 GMT
I had Snell E II's as part-X against the last pair of Isobariks I owned and was desperate to get shot of. Fine with soft toned Audio Innovations amps in a large room, but hideous in a smaller room - something nasty going on at the crossover point, either the tweeter coming down too low or the main driver taking off before the crossover could catch it. Current AN speakers look the same old fashioned design, but the drivers are different along with the sky-high price. Those Snells lasted a week!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2018 6:37:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Jul 5, 2018 9:10:23 GMT
Great to see the B110 and T27 back in production. Harbeth took the original tooling from KEF I gather - and buried it I think... Glad you like your Falcons. I just can't enjoy music through them and I used them with many different systems at the time. Mind you, my love of The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy was born from first listening to the show via original LS3/5A's The B139 may well live on soon in 'racetrack' version as per the TDL (not the Chinese knock-offs used by Linn in the Keltik I was told) and all we need is the B200 to go back into production to please blown up Sara users
|
|
|
Post by macca on Jul 5, 2018 12:03:49 GMT
Falcon are doing 10% discount on all orders while England are still in the world cup. A fair saving if you are after some of their LS3/5a
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2018 16:52:12 GMT
Best be quick discount ends Saturday
|
|
|
Post by macca on Jul 5, 2018 16:57:24 GMT
Now then...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2018 20:32:27 GMT
Best puchase ive made, Falcon acoustics LS3/5A.
Ive heard a few over the years, all poor facsimiles of the original, but Falcons use original spec drivers.
Keep yer 8ohm jobbies, and the fake Rogers, Kef, Harbeth wannabe 11 ohm jobbies.
Harbeth P3ESR................NOT EVEN CLOSE DAVE .....THINK Q ACOUSTIC....FFS.
😁😁😁😁😁
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Aug 19, 2018 9:05:54 GMT
In your dreams jammy, in your dreams...
Ignoring low prices, have you heard the latest Q Acoustics models properly?
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
AA Founding Member & Bigbottle Audio Creator
Posts: 16,358
|
Post by Bigman80 on Aug 19, 2018 9:21:29 GMT
I used to despise the very sight of Q Acoustics. They look to be the epitome of Chinese made cheap speakers. Having read a bit more, I can see they are well made. I haven’t heard any and probably never will. Conventional speakers of that size with plastic drivers just don’t interest me any more. I need a bigger sound and I couldn’t face the prospect of them firing at me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 9:40:58 GMT
You mirror my thoughts there.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Aug 19, 2018 11:19:35 GMT
I used to despise the very sight of Q Acoustics. They look to be the epitome of Chinese made cheap speakers. Having read a bit more, I can see they are well made. I haven’t heard any and probably never will. Conventional speakers of that size with plastic drivers just don’t interest me any more. I need a bigger sound and I couldn’t face the prospect of them firing at me. And you lot tell me to keep an open mind...
I give up. Nothing more to say here...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 11:50:27 GMT
Oh cheer up, Dave. Not the end of the world, FFS.
S.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 13:15:23 GMT
In your dreams jammy, in your dreams...
Ignoring low prices, have you heard the latest Q Acoustics models properly?
Yes I've heard them in most of their guises Dave they are a popular choice offshore on the rigs (mostly in the gym's and rec rooms for home cinema set up) And to be honest that imho is all they are fit for.....They are far short of high fidelity. My thoughts mirror Westies, Wals & Shanes. Your recommendation goes some way to explaining your love of Harbeth however.😁😁😁
|
|
Bigman80
Grandmaster
AA Founding Member & Bigbottle Audio Creator
Posts: 16,358
|
Post by Bigman80 on Aug 19, 2018 13:18:38 GMT
Yeah, by now I pretty much know what I do and don’t want. Nothing wrong with saying it. Small box with placcy drivers pointing straight at me isn’t going to be for me..Same as I wouldn’t bother with a small base model hatchback if I was buying a car.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Aug 19, 2018 13:28:35 GMT
Who says I love Harbeth jammy?
I've been waiting six months for proper 'M30' boxes so I can flog and safely ship the LS5/9's, the SHL 5's have been boxed for nearly two years and now I have some taller stands, they get one more chance before I flog 'em if the bass is still boomy! I fell out a couple of years ago with Alan Shaw (by PM rather than on the HUG forum) and can no longer post there.
Maybe I know this brand better than anyone here, but I don't have to like them and as the finish of the P3ESR's is so much better than the Falcon 3/5A and the drivers so much more advanced (less distortion/no bextrene-quack, sweeter highs - the T27 was spiced up by the mesh over the front to better show tape hiss/higher max volume levels/significantly better imaging), being the fussy man you are, I'd have thought you'd have jumped at a pair ofP3ESR's, especially the anniversary ones with special finish,fancy sockets and 'better' caps in the crossover. The standard model when Croft driven was at least as good as the ATC 20ASL pro's I was selling and compared directly to!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 13:31:44 GMT
Dave, I saw you snogging PSESR's in the back seat of your car. Have it all on tape. Might publish it on YouTube!!
S.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 13:58:58 GMT
the finish of the P3ESR's is so much better than the Falcon 3/5A and the drivers so much more advanced (less distortion/no bextrene-quack, sweeter highs - the T27 was spiced up by the mesh over the front to better show tape hiss/higher max volume levels/significantly better imaging), being the fussy man you are, I'd have thought you'd have jumped at a pair ofP3ESR's, especially the anniversary ones with special finish,fancy sockets and 'better' caps in the crossover. Well beauty as they say, Is in the eye of the beholder. (l prefer the classic look of the Falcons to the bling look of the Harbeths) But the real reason I chose the wee Falcons over the wee Harbeths was simply because to my lugs they sounded better. Oh and I wanted a pair LS3/5As the P3ESRs are not LS3/5As. Once again each to their own........
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Aug 19, 2018 13:59:28 GMT
Where did you compare them jammy and what was the gear used?
I suppose the NVA amps aren't the best choice for BBC derived boxes (and a Sugden A21A2 certainly isn't!), but the Radford would have done well I suspect, as mine drive the equally complex BC1's really well all those decades ago.
Oh, and I have directly compared them too, even if your preferences are different.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 14:05:48 GMT
Why?
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Aug 19, 2018 14:08:23 GMT
Why what? Compare the current proper 3/5A with the P3ESR? To update my knowledge of these two I suppose.
Lets face it, the Beeb have replaced all their smaller passive monitors with Dyn-Audio BM5A's for nigh on twenty years now...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 14:17:08 GMT
Dave you can't update knowledge on mere hearsay, whilst I preferred the F's to the H's you may differ, you must hear the proper LS3/5A for yourself and draw your own conclusions.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Aug 19, 2018 15:14:11 GMT
And that is what I've recently done jammy. Look, I can't do the dem myself so not worth talking about further.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 16:45:37 GMT
Yes my current system is NVA and not sure why but the Falcon sound better driven by the stereo A60 as opposed to my pair of A70 monos....!!!! Goes plenty loud uncomfortably so if required but I listen at low to medium levels so they fill the room (12m x 10m) easily....base is phenomenal rattles the walls and almost caves your chest in....... Only kidding...but more than ample unless your a KLF / Massive attack fan.....Then you may want to look elsewhere. They excel with John Martyn, Tim Buckley, Nirvana Unplugged is superb, Kate Bush, Tori Amos, etc etc... As you suggest NVA is probably holding them back somewhat, can't wait till my Radford STA25,s arrive. By all accounts that is a match made in heaven......Will keep you posted.
|
|